Skip to main content
Myrmex Multi-Agent System Architecture

The Myrmex Platform’s Multi-Agent Architecture: Collective Intelligence for Cybersecurity

The Myrmex platform is built upon an advanced multi-agent system (MAS) architecture, where each “agent” is a specialized entity with a distinct set of skills and responsibilities. At the heart of this orchestration is Centurion, the Master Orchestrator and Chief Intelligence Coordinator, whose role is to understand user intent, analyze task complexity, and coordinate the synergy among these agents to deliver comprehensive and intelligent solutions. This modular and collaborative approach allows Myrmex to tackle complex cybersecurity challenges with unparalleled efficiency and adaptability.

Benefits of the Multi-Agent Architecture

Adopting a multi-agent architecture offers significant advantages, translating into a more robust and effective security platform:
  1. Deep Specialization: Each agent is an expert in its specific domain (e.g., device management, threat intelligence, documentation). This ensures that every task is executed with the highest level of expertise and precision, without the need for a generic “jack-of-all-trades” agent.
  2. Resilience and Robustness: The modularity of the architecture means that the failure or maintenance of one agent does not compromise the operation of the entire system. Centurion can, in many cases, adapt the strategy or reallocate tasks, ensuring service continuity.
  3. Efficient Scalability: The platform can be easily scaled by adding new specialized agents or expanding the capabilities of existing agents, without the need for re-engineering the entire system. This allows Myrmex to grow and adapt to the constantly evolving demands of the threat landscape.
  4. Operational Efficiency: Distributing tasks among agents enables parallel processing and simultaneous execution of different aspects of a request. This optimizes response time and resource utilization.
  5. Adaptability and Flexibility: The architecture allows the platform to quickly adapt to new technologies, threats, and security requirements. New agents can be integrated to address emerging challenges while maintaining system cohesion.
  6. Collective Intelligence and Synergy: The collaboration between agents, orchestrated by Centurion, generates an intelligence that is greater than the sum of its parts. The ability to combine insights from different domains (e.g., device data, external intelligence, security logs) results in deeper analyses and more informed decisions.

Demonstrating Collaboration: Practical Examples

The true strength of the Multi-Agent architecture lies in the agents’ ability to work together, under Centurion’s coordination, to solve complex problems.

Example 1: Comprehensive Security Incident Response

Imagine a scenario where an alert indicates a possible intrusion on one of your servers. Centurion would orchestrate the following collaborative sequence of actions:
1

Initial Detection & Contextualization

Centurion

Receives the alert and analyzes the situation

Iris

Searches for external threat intelligence and related IoCs
2

Device Analysis and Identification

Brontes

Identifies the affected server and collects detailed information (OS, running services, security configurations)
3

Forensic Investigation and Impact Analysis

Perseus

Performs in-depth analysis: checking event logs, running processes, modified files, and active network connections to determine the extent of the intrusion
4

Threat Intelligence and Attribution

Orion

Analyzes collected IoCs to attribute the threat to a specific actor group or campaign, providing crucial information for the response
5

Mitigation and Containment

Hydra

Applies containment measures: blocking malicious IPs on Fortigate FGT-NM, isolating the compromised server, or disabling vulnerable services
6

Post-Incident Documentation

Scribe

Compiles a detailed incident report including timeline, findings from each agent, and actions taken for auditing and learning purposes

Example 2: Proactive Security Posture Assessment and Recommendations

For continuous security posture assessment, the collaboration would be as follows:
1

Inventory and Baseline

Brontes

Maintains an updated inventory of all network devices, monitoring their configurations and status
2

Vulnerability Analysis

Orion

Monitors for new vulnerabilities (CVEs) and correlates them with Brontes’ inventory to identify potentially vulnerable devices

Brontes

Analyzes device configurations for security policy deviations
3

Hardening Recommendations

Centurion

Formulates hardening recommendations based on analyses from Brontes and Orion

Hydra

Suggests and applies optimized firewall configurations, IPS policies, or network segmentation for network devices like Fortigate FGT-NM
4

Documentation and Compliance

Scribe

Generates compliance reports and security posture assessments, detailing identified vulnerabilities, recommended actions, and implementation status, providing a clear executive overview of the organization’s security